Ziogos v FSS & Metlife [2015] NSWSC1385 (Equity)
This summary is about this question:
1. Whether the insurer MetLife had acted with the utmost good faith in the consideration of the TPD claim; and
2. What does “unlikely” mean? Within the definition (§) of the TPD policy ie whether the insured was “unlikely to ever engage in any gainful profession for which she is suited by education, training or experience”.
The case clarifies what “unlikely” means.
Ziogos v FSS & Metlife [2015] NSWSC1385 (Equity)
NSW Supreme Court
Justice Ball
This is a case involving a NSW Police Officer, her psychological injury and her claim for a TPD benefit. The TPD claim sought both a Basic Benefit and also a special benefit called a PBRI (Police Blue Ribbon Insurance benefit).
The main issues in this case are:
1. Did the insurer MetLife act with the utmost good faith in the consideration of the claim; and
2. What “unlikely” means within the definition (§) of the TPD policy ie whether the police officer was “unlikely to ever engage in...